Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign
Fighting threats from Stalinists and Fascists to use court injunctions and physical violence to silence free speech
The working class can kiss my arse, I've got the Councillor's job at last
The Luke Akehurst blog - The genuine Luke Akehurst weblog about politics, elections, the Labour Party and that ghastly Hackney place. Ignore counterfeit Luke Akehurst blogs - this is the genuine article from the chap who whips Hackney Labour councillors in his spare time.
Now with extra added ingredient Linda K Smith. Helps wash your family whiter!

"My favourite film is Dr. Strangelove, Or: How I Learnt To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb" - Luke Akehurst
"Funny and clever but not particularly nice" - Time Out
"With added foie gras, steak, soft cheese, claret and port (hic!)" - Luke Akehurst
"In gustatus perquam putidus est" - Vatican Bank
"Not so much 'Who's Who?' as 'Who's Sleeping With Whom?'" - Peter Mandelson
"You can judge a blogger's politics by the colour of their blog banner" - The spoof Luke Akehurst
"By a coalition of Trots, tree huggers, anarchists, Tories and a nasty little clique over-excited about my hair colour" - Luke Akehurst

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Lords Reform

It's over 95 years since Royal assent was given for The Parliament Act 1911, the preamble of which states: "it is intended to substitute for the House of Lords as it at present exists a Second Chamber constituted on a popular instead of hereditary basis, but such substitution cannot be immediately brought into operation." Yet we still have the travesty of a second chamber most members of which are appointed. I don't believe that anyone who has been appointed by virtue of being on a list (whether or not Abe Levy drew it up or was even aware of its existence) should be involved in passing the laws we live under.

In the past I was in favour of a 100% elected Upper House and I would have been delighted by tonight's Commons margin of 113 in favour of a 100% elected chamber. But given the current state of the political opinion polls, the debate about cash-for-honours and the great success of many of the Government's public service charging schemes (dentistry, tuition fees, hospital vouchers, toll roads, etc.) I am now of the opinion that this is not the best option. My view was stiffened when I saw that grinning monkey Jack Straw on TV just now, announcing the result with a smile as wide as Rita Tushingham. If Jack Straw and Simon Hughes support the bill I know it must be wrong.

I think the House of Lords performs a vital role in exerting checks and balances on the government of the day and in the coming years this is likely to be an even more important function than it is now. I see nothing in conflict with the "democratic" bit of the phrase "the Labour Party is a democratic socialist party" in my plan to put everything openly on the table and institute a bill of tariff for the Upper House. So here is my draft proposal. The current bill is bound to be rejected in the Lords and rather than see The Parliament Act invoked I hope MPs will see sense and adopt my novel and creative idea.

A transparent proposal for Lords reform


Elroy Partington-Whistler said...

What. No discounts for senior citizens? Mind you, I suppose...

Chris Paul said...

Your "box office" has missed off several categories including :

The Guest List - reserved for very decrepit, LEGACY

The House Seats - reserved for nubile, SEXUAL FAVOURS, and/or white powders

The Press Gallery - reserved for crooked press barons who press their case with cheery blandishments, Election day front poster cover should secure, two if very crooked

The Choir Stalls - simply sing from the same hymnsheet (not like a canary)

Luke Akehurst said...

The only thing missing from this picture is an extra-large seat marked "reserved for Lord Akehurst".